Shakespeare - Man Or Myth Essays - William Shakespeare,

Shakespeare - Man or Myth? Was the man we know as Shakespeare really the author ofthe "Shakespearean Works"? We know little about the man called Shakespeare, Did he really write the plays, or is he just a man that got confused within history? (Sobran 44) There is not even a correct spelling of this mans name, Some of the spellings include Shakspere, Shakespeare, And Shaxpere. Shakespeare, Is it the man, Or is it another? (Hayes 1D) Shakespeare is both fact and fiction, he was no concern until nearly two hundred years after he perished, and there is still no definite or probably will there ever be a conclusion to this mystery. (Sobran 44) There is another man that can be attributed with the works of "Shakespeare", His name is Edward DeVere, the 17th Earl of Oxford. (Bethell 47) The man known as Shakespeare does not fit perfectly into the necessary criteria to determine the author of these works. Thomas Looney invented a series of criteria that had to be filled, in order to be a possible candidate for the authorship of the Shakespearean works. To have all the knowledge that is portrayed in the works, the author must have accomplished many things. These including a superior education, from what we know of "Shakespeare", this was not a possibility.(Bethell 46) We do not even know if Shakespeare has ever written anything in his life, Nor do we know that he was paid for writing these works. The man Shakespeare does not even make a claim that he is the author.(Bethell 50) He may not have been able to write the simplest thing of all, His own name.(Hayes 1D) Its not how little we know about Shakespeare that causes confusion and difficulty, Its the things that we do know about this man that cause the confusion and difficulty. We know Shakespears father, a glover, could not write. When he signed documents, he simply made an "X", This is why it is beleived that Shakespeare could not write also, Because he probably did not attend school therefore his education was passed down from his father. (Bethell 48) We do know much more about the man Edward DeVere. We know that because deVere was a nobleman, he could not have his name written upon his writings because he would be considered of a lower class. The plays contain a sense of hate towards some of the noblemen of that time period, which also point the authorship towards DeVere. (Hayes 1D) When DeVere was a young man, he spent a lot of time in Italy and Europe, This could explain the great detail used in the Shakespearean plays of Venice, and other European locations.(Sobran 45) The sonnets have never been able to fit into Shakespears life, On the other hand they fit into DeVere's life well. (Sobran 45) There are facts that lean both ways in this age old mystery of authorship, Though the Strafordian man does not fit into the story very well, He may have some advantages that the Oxfordian man may not. DeVere on the other hand, has mostly every fact pointing towards him as the valid author for the "Shakespearean" works, From his education, to his experiences, to his travel. The Oxfordian seems to come out on top. Shakespeare: Stratforidan, or DeVere?

A Shadow of a Bull essays

A Shadow of a Bull essays The title of the book is Shadow Of A Bull. It is an appropriate title for the book because Manolo is expected to become a great bullfighter just like his father was. In My Fathers Shadow would also be appropriate because Manolo is supposed to become a bullfighter just like his father. The story took place in Spain, in the mid 1950s. The setting affected the story because it was in small town in Spain were a lot of bullfighting is the number one sporting event. In Spain being a bullfighter is very honorable. A different setting would not work as well because if they were in another country bullfighting would not be as popular. The conflict of the story is man vs. himself. This is proved when Manolo tries to get the courage to fight the bull even though he is very scared of it. The protagonist is Manolo. The antagonists are the six men and the bull. The story begins with people comparing Manolo with his father. They would say he has the same eyes and the same long nose and they believed he would become a great bullfighter like his father. People in town tell Manolo how brave his father was and how he would carry on his Legacy. Manolo knows inside himself that he is not as brave as his father. There were six men, aficionados, people who are dedicated to bullfighting and dedicated to Juan Olivars career as a bullfighter. These six men became Manolos tutors. They wanted to teach Manolo everything they knew about bullfighting. For two years Manolo was tutored and lectured by these six men. They took to bullfights at least two times a month. They pointed out the turns and the movements of the cape the bullfighter performed. A bullfighter was expected lure the bull with his cape as close as possible. In the one would die the bull or the fighter. Manolo is told he cannot touch the muleta, cape, or sword and practice before his first fight. This was how it was with his father and must be the same with him. He would b...